In Defence of Bath Place Community Venture & The Old Library

In Defence of Bath Place Community Venture & The Old Library

"Those things alone are good which are honourable"

The Leamington Spa town motto

It was around Christmas time of 2009 when I first arrived in Bath Place @ The Old Library for the annual festive dinner in the act of wooing (apparently successfully as we are now engaged and have a new baby daughter) one Melissa Rood, who, as it happened, is the learning Co-ordinator at Bath Place. I came to understand quite clearly that the Organization was playing a necessary and critical role in the Community of Leamington Spa and felt compelled instantly to get stuck in and get involved.

I started to hang around quite a bit and before too long I was put to work building the Veggie Table Café II which for me, personally, has proved to be one of the most fulfilling and satisfying labours of my career thus far. I say that after working on projects as varied as Charles Darwin Centre at The Museum of Natural History in London and The Royal Theatre in Bath both of which were high profile, multi-million pound designs.

As a craftsman, it is especially rewarding to use ones skills to contribute in a meaningful way and for me, knowing that the Venture had suffered a devastating fire a few months before, to help the Café to rise from the ashes of a terrible tragedy was both a enormously proud and humbling experience at the same time. The Café now is serving healthy & delicious meals at a very affordable price and I would challenge anyone to find a better bowl of soup well, anywhere really...

I spent the next months getting to know the inner workings of the Charity and helping to run the Virtual School for Asylum Seeking Minors under the guidance of Melissa, along with a wide range of Volunteers and in December of 2010 both Melissa, myself and others with close ties to the Community, were elected to serve as Trustees on the Board of Directors.

Over the past 2 years Bath Place has, with the dedication of the Staff and the help of countless volunteers, managed to resurrect the Ground floor of the Building and most of the basement and, during the day and evening is now home to numerous businesses, Social Enterprises, Educational activities and an endless stream of local individuals, groups, meetings, with vocational training, counselling sessions, art exhibits, benefit concerts and many other important local events.

Just as an example, where else can you find, as I do on a typical Thursday night, the head of the NHS for Warwickshire PCT addressing the Fabian Society, The Women’s Institute, ESOL tutoring, an Anandky Yoga class, a Zumba Dance session and (as if that wasn’t enough) the weekly practice of the much beloved Steel Pan Academy ? We are now also home to the Spires Orchestra, a nationally recognized youth orchestra and also the County Music Service, both integral and highly valued music programs for young people.

Other evenings have hosted the Conservative Party, who generously furnished our IT suite, The Labour Party, All-Party Election Debates, Warwick University, Amnesty International, The Leamington History Group, Multi-faith Groups, Local Weddings, Youth Drama, Employment agencies, U3A and Yoga. The list goes on and on…

It takes an enormous amount of coordination on a very tight budget to keep everything running smoothly and I have put in many hours volunteering in this important work but for me, there are some questions that need to be asked and more importantly, answered as quickly as possible.

First, a little history…

The land where we are situated was granted to the Borough of Leamington Spa in 1899 by a generous land grant from the Wise family for the purposes of a Public Library, an Art & Technical School, a Museum or “any other municipal building” but is currently owned by Warwickshire College due to the fact that the building was transfered by the County Council for the sum of £97 000 in 1999. Now, 12 years on, the College is looking to sell the building for an asking price of around £1.5 million and we are aware of at least one Developer who is interested in converting the Building into high-end Flats & Offices.

We have spent time, money and a massive amount our precious energies on trying to raise the capital to purchase the building but sadly, after searching far and wide, have not as yet found anyone who is willing or able to commit to us that kind of support.

For us, a loan of that nature would create a considerable risk as, although we are a self sustaining Charity, it would be a challenge to be able to cover the repayments on such a loan through our commercial and charitable activities and, as has been widely discussed throughout the sector, Grant Funding has become a lot more scarce and harder to secure than ever before. Due to our lack of "security of tenure" we have faced difficulty in gaining the confidence of Funders who can offer us support.

In short, we are at the epicentre of one of quandaries the Third Sector is facing on both the local and the national level.

The questions therefore that need to be asked are these:

How is it that a Public edifice, built on land granted to the Community over one hundred years ago, could possibly ever be sold to private interests for such a massive profit, especially by a fellow community organisation?

How is it that a Charity that has committed itself to serving the Community for over 35 years fulfilling a genuine need for support and space for everyone, the excluded, the marginalized, the young, the old, from all walks of life, should have to go looking to external entities to essentially pay fifteen times over for a building that has already been purposely built for the use of the Community of Leamington Spa?

How is it that a beautiful and masterfully crafted Grade II Listed building in the heart of a generally prosperous town can be left to degenerate and decay until such time as a Commercial buyer can be found, whilst completely ignoring the efforts and needs of those who have come to use, care for, preserve and even love a Community Asset even despite it’s neglected state ?

I would never wish to cast dispersions on Warwickshire College as they are unquestionably an integral part of the local landscape and far be it from me to question the beneficence of our County Council but in this case, I think they are both acting against the interests of the common good.

In the case of the College, although they kindly allowed us access to the building initially, to intend to sell a Community Asset that was ceded at a very low, almost gifted, price for such an inflated sum to a thriving Community Centre or even a commercial entity, is in my view, unacceptable and I would suspect that, if widely known, many across the political spectrum would share this view as well.

As for the Council, I would only say that perhaps what seemed like a good idea at the time has not turned out to be such a wise decision if honestly reflected through the prism of hindsight. Knowing what I now know about our finances, I could reasonably guarantee that if we were offered a price of £97 000 (or something in that region) we would be able to raise that money in a heartbeat and Local Government would be able credit themselves with a fully functioning, all singing, all dancing Community Anchor that provides a whole range of services and programs that could help and support all kinds of Public activities and Creative events for young and old. To my mind, all things any self-respecting Community should not have to go without.

For the life of me I can’t understand why our existence should be hanging by such a perilous thread although I suppose the argument could be made that a Charity works better when in the midst of a continual struggle for survival. Perhaps it keeps the senses sharp & the focus more concentrated…but I digress.

Presently, we are looking to create Partnerships with other Community and Educational organisations and are exploring the possibility of launching The Leamington Community Venture as a confederation of liked minded Charities, Social Enterprises and Arts Groups but without the support of all three levels of Government and, crucially, a change of heart from Warwickshire College, I’m afraid it’s just a great vision that will never be realized.

In these days when the national discussion is all about Localism, Social Enterprise, Volunteerism and Community Empowerment there isn’t one of these aims that we do not fulfil in every way.

People like to talk about what the “big society” is and there are many who would say they struggle to understand what it actually means, but I’ll say one thing and I say this with all of the conviction I can summon up, if we are not it, then it doesn’t exist…

Clayton Denwood – Site Supervisor

Bath Place Community Venture @ The Old Library

17.02.2012

https://picasaweb.google.com/clayton.denwood/CroatiaItaly411?authkey=Gv1sRgCNianbPKsNyUag#

Nothing At All (Except You) Video

If you were to stroll across Parliament Square one autumn night and look upon the statuary surrounding it,
you'd notice an imposing figure with it's obvious prominence.
The colossal statue of Winston Churchill, bathed in a purplish light and casting an enormous shadow across the lawn,
occupies it's place on the prime corner in the heart of Westminster.
Just to his right there is a more diminutive yet more deserving of a character.
Churchill may be the leader most remember but it was David Lloyd George, portrayed with arm outstretched, coattails blowing in the wind, who changed the nature of the state forever.
As an MP, Chancellor and later Prime Minister during World War I, Lloyd George embodied the concept
that economic and social change can be made manifest through government.
He oversaw the policies of old-age pension, unemployment benefit, financial support for the sick
and infirm which today remain the backbone of the modern welfare state.
His support for Women's Suffrage and his "People's Budget" of 1909 were radical departures
and key milestones in the battle for a more equal society.

He remains the bravest challenger that the acronistic House of Lords has ever known, even after

a century has passed. That fact alone, speaks volumes and is a genuine and monumental indictment on the political lethargy of the last hundred years.

John Maynard Keynes, the economist, spoke of "A half-human visitor to our age from the hag-ridden magic and enchanted woods of Celtic antiquity".
Churchill later eulogized him saying, “Those who come after will find the pillars of his life’s toil upstanding, massive and indestructible.”
It can be fairly argued that David Lloyd George led Great Britain through some of its's greatest trials and left it wiser and more compassionate than anyone before or since.

Regardless of all that's been claimed by Mr. Osbourne he has to admit that raising VAT is the most uncreative, unimaginative & dull of all the options on the table. I mean, it's all a bit 101 isn't it ? The bluntest tool in the shed ?

Any Chancellor with wisdom would realize that perhaps now isn't the time to further trouble an economy already feeling tapped and pressured. He could have waited until the time was a bit more ripe if at all.... Then again, we'll all just get used to it won't we ?

If he truly cared for people, which incidentally, should be the first criterion of a Chancellor, let alone a politician, he might ask himself what really is in the best interests of the country but it seems that he doesn't really have a clue. Or a care. It's going to worry a lot of people that are already terrified. Nice.

The day George Osbourne is remembered as a great Chancellor is not on the horizon as far as I can see. They may say he "did what was required" or " was tough when necessary" but fundamentally he lacks or, seems to lack, any sense of the common touch. I think it's known as the "vision" thing

We need epochal, humane, far sighted thinking, we get...a VAT rise. The genius of simplicity ? Maybe.

Considering the vast amount of alternatives that have been presented over the last few years it strikes me as both cowardly and cynical.

True, it may go some way towards lowering the consumption of needless frippery and arguably the incremental price rise can be seen to be meaningless but there is no arguing that percentage wise it hits the lower income bracket harder as a proportion of their income.

Robin Hood in reverse indeed.

Just lame, luddite economic policy really.

In other words...Conservative. In extremis.

Baby's Blue

Baby'sBlue by CLAYTON DENWOOD

Tryin' To Resist Video

Birmingham Museum 2010

Birmingham Museum 2010

CLAYTON DENWOOD on Myspace Music - Free Streaming MP3s, Pictures & Music Videos

CLAYTON DENWOOD on Myspace Music - Free Streaming MP3s, Pictures & Music Videos

18.11.2008

A philosophical stalemate has appeared on the horizon. The debate reflects back and forth across the aisles of Parliaments and Congresses alike. Why bother ? For an ever growing number the argument is over and the answer is as clear as clean water.

Western governments, in their narrow spectrum, left vs. right paradigm, like to mull over facts and figures like tax cuts, interest rates and other obscure financial mechanisms claiming that their specific policy will find a way out of the collapse of this epic global economic debacle.

According to Robert Jensen, professor of journalism at the University of Texas,

"We aren’t facing a temporary downturn caused by a burst bubble but instead are moving into a new phase in the permanent decline of a system that has never met the human needs of most people and never will. It's time to start imagining and building an economics based on production and distribution for real human needs, rejecting the corrosive greed that underlies not only the obscene profits hoarded by the few but also the orgiastic consumption pursued by the many."

Watching the way retailers and to some extent, governments, have been falling over themselves to try to get the populace spending the the holiday season it's difficult to not concur with him. It seems that we're trapped in a structure that defines us purely as raw units of commerce and ultimately slaves to the massive entities that exist solely to make as much profit as possible.

In other words, we're buying into a massive con. We're on a treadmill to nowhere.

The recent foundering and attempted salvage of the Western banking fleet is a prime example, if you'll pardon the pun. The recent pleas for emergency funding from the automotive manufacturers in the US even more profoundly illustrates the point. In this case, these companies could have spent their time developing more efficient vehicles instead of trying to sell huge gas wasting behemoths in collusion with the oil industry. These jalopies, and the gas that fuels them, was promoted to the detriment of more environmentally sound public transport.

David Morris, an economist also, perhaps ironically , from Texas, put it this way.

"The system requires careful management and regulation by someone who doesn't stand to gain from ripping the rest of us off. We are all socialists, whether we like it or not. The only choice you have is what kind of socialism you want to live under. You can choose to support a socialism that calls itself capitalist until the profits run out, and begs a loan from the public, or you can create policies that recognize how much we all depend on one another, and that seek to help us work together for a secure society."

The word "socialism" has been tossed, ridiculed and exiled from the political conversation but it is clear from recent events that the nations which make the choices towards sustainable, fair and more balanced economies will be the vanguard of the future and the guardians of the world's survival.

˜

Counting with Castro
06.01.2008


Fidel Castro made an interesting analogy recently. In his inimitable way he explained the empirical reality
of United States debt, which today stands at $10 trillion.
"A man working eight hours a day, 300 days per year, without missing a second, counting one hundred one-dollar bills per minute,"
he postulates, "would need 710 billion years to count that amount of money."
Barring any cosmic catastrophe and overlooking the ridiculousness of the concept, the job would never be completed.

Castro seized power in Cuba on January of 1959 in a Marxist revolution and US legislators, fueled largely by hysteria,
have spent the last 50 years attempting to overthrow him primarily through an oppressive trade embargo.
There has always existed an ingrained paranoia in the US towards communism and it's fear has often trumped reason.
Billions have been spent in a failed effort to subvert the values embraced by most of Cuba's people
and their suffering has been magnified by the belligerent inequity of American policy.

The Department of the US Treasury released $700 billion in a bid to salvage an irresponsible banking system
which essentially, equates to a widely described "socialism for the wealthy" in all but name.
The irony certainly isn't trivial. The hypocrisy is epic.
Cuban communism, Castro-style, isn't a blissful paradise by any stretch, and 50 years is perhaps insignificant in the face of
710 billion but the embargo was, and still remains, a morally bankrupt waste of time... and money.